Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Foreword
Guest Editorial
Media and News
Referees for First Issue
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Foreword
Guest Editorial
Media and News
Referees for First Issue
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Foreword
Guest Editorial
Media and News
Referees for First Issue
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/CRCR_69_2025

Imaging hallmarks of late-infantile onset Krabbe’s disease: Case-based insights - A case report

Department of Radiology, Government Medical College, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.

*Corresponding author: Arushi Prakash Jethani, Department of Radiology, Government Medical College, Vadodara, Gujarat, India. arushijethani469@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Jethani AP, Agrawal A. Imaging hallmarks of late-infantile onset Krabbe’s disease: Case-based insights - A case report. Case Rep Clin Radiol. doi: 10.25259/CRCR_69_2025

Abstract

Krabbe disease is a rare autosomal recessive leukodystrophy, most commonly presenting in infancy with rapid neurological decline. We report a case of a 10-month-old female who presented with developmental delay, poor feeding, and central hypotonia. Brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed bilateral symmetrical T2 hyperintensities in the periventricular white matter of the cerebral and cerebellar hemispheres and in the dentate nucleus hilum. Nerve conduction studies showed evidence of motor demyelinating polyneuropathy, and otoacoustic emission screening revealed hearing impairment in the right ear. Genetic analysis confirmed a likely pathogenic variant associated with Krabbe disease. This case highlights the value of integrating imaging, electrophysiological studies, and genetic findings in diagnosing infantile leukodystrophies.

Keywords

Developmental delay
Krabbe’s disease
Leukodystrophy
Motor demyelinating polyneuropathy

INTRODUCTION

Krabbe disease (globoid cell leukodystrophy) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder caused by a deficiency of the lysosomal enzyme galactocerebrosidase (GALC), resulting in extensive demyelination in the central and peripheral nervous systems.[1] The infantile form, which is the most common and severe, typically presents within the 1st year of life with irritability, spasticity, feeding difficulties, and developmental regression.[2] Neuroimaging and electrophysiological studies play a pivotal role in early diagnosis, which is essential for considering disease-modifying interventions.[3]

CASE REPORT

A 10-month-old female presented with poor feeding, global developmental delay, and central hypotonia. She did not have any vision complaints. Her birth history was unremarkable, with no neonatal intensive care unit admission or perinatal complications. Family history was insignificant. Initial clinical impression included neuromuscular disorder or congenital hypotonia. Sensory and motor nerve conduction studies demonstrated electrophysiological evidence of motor demyelinating polyneuropathy, consistent with peripheral nervous system involvement. Otoacoustic emission (OAE) screening showed a possible hearing impairment in the right ear, indicating possible cochlear dysfunction or early hearing loss.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain revealed bilateral, symmetrical T2 hyperintensity and T1 hypointensity in the periventricular white matter of the cerebral hemispheres, cerebellar white matter, and hilum of the dentate nucleus [Figures 1 and 2]. The subcortical white matter and cortical gray matter appeared normal. The thalamus and optic nerves appeared unremarkable. These findings were suggestive of a leukoencephalopathy. The patient then underwent genetic analysis. Genome sequencing identified a likely pathogenic variant in the GALC gene [Figure 3], suggesting the diagnosis of Krabbe disease.

Magnetic resonance imaging of brain in a 10-month-old female with developmental delay. Axial T2-weighted image shows bilateral symmetrical T2 hyperintensity in periventricular white matter in bilateral cerebral hemispheres (black arrows) with sparing of subcortical white matter. Thalami and basal ganglia as well as cerebral cortex appear unremarkable.
Figure 1:
Magnetic resonance imaging of brain in a 10-month-old female with developmental delay. Axial T2-weighted image shows bilateral symmetrical T2 hyperintensity in periventricular white matter in bilateral cerebral hemispheres (black arrows) with sparing of subcortical white matter. Thalami and basal ganglia as well as cerebral cortex appear unremarkable.
Magnetic resonance imaging of brain in a 10-month-old female with developmental delay. Coronal T1 weighted image (a) and T2 weighted image (b) show bilateral symmetrical T1 hypointensity and T2 hyperintensity in white matter in cerebral hemispheres (white arrows) and cerebellar hemispheres (black arrows). Bilateral dentate hilum appear T2 hyperintense (blue arrows).
Figure 2:
Magnetic resonance imaging of brain in a 10-month-old female with developmental delay. Coronal T1 weighted image (a) and T2 weighted image (b) show bilateral symmetrical T1 hypointensity and T2 hyperintensity in white matter in cerebral hemispheres (white arrows) and cerebellar hemispheres (black arrows). Bilateral dentate hilum appear T2 hyperintense (blue arrows).
Genome analysis report of a 10-month-old female with developmental delay showing Krabbe’s disease. CNV: Copy number variant, OMIM: Online mendelian inheritance in man.
Figure 3:
Genome analysis report of a 10-month-old female with developmental delay showing Krabbe’s disease. CNV: Copy number variant, OMIM: Online mendelian inheritance in man.

DISCUSSION

Infantile Krabbe disease presents with rapid neurological deterioration due to both central and peripheral demyelination. Typical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in Krabbe’s disease can be variable in different phenotypes depending on age of onset-early infantile (EI): <6 months of age, late infantile (LI): 7 months–3 years, juvenile (J): 3–8 years, and adult (A): >9 years.[4] Findings in EI and LI groups typically include confluent deep cerebral and cerebellar white matter signal changes along with posterior limb of internal capsule and brainstem corticospinal tract (CST) involvement as well as dentate hilum involvement, which is more characteristic of EI onset disease.[3,4] The Tigroid pattern of involvement of cerebral white matter may or may not be seen. Juvenile and adult groups may show variable imaging patterns, such as confluent posterior deep white matter hyperintensity with or without CST and/or splenial involvement, isolated CST involvement. Rarely, patchy supratentorial white matter and dentate hilum hyperintensities without deep cerebellar white matter involvement may also be seen, usually in the juvenile or adult group.[4] Involved supratentorial white matter, CST, and corpus callosum may show restricted diffusion. Other typical findings include thalamic volume loss with T2 hypointensity and optic nerve hypertrophy, commonly seen in EI onset (<6 months) disease.[4] Rare findings such as cervical cord and lower brainstem enlargement, cranial nerve enhancement, and involvement of lateral spinothalamic tract on spine imaging may also be seen.[4]

The combination of MRI findings – specifically symmetrical periventricular white matter hyperintensities and dentate hilum involvement and polyneuropathy on electrophysiological testing is highly suggestive.[2,5] The demyelinating motor polyneuropathy observed in this patient aligns with the known peripheral nervous system involvement in Krabbe disease, attributed to psychosine accumulation and Schwann cell dysfunction.[1] In addition, early auditory pathway involvement, as suggested by OAE screening, is reported in lysosomal storage disorders but is less frequently documented in Krabbe disease.[6]

Differentials include other infantile leukodystrophies such as metachromatic leukodystrophy and Canavan disease, which can be distinguished based on imaging, enzyme activity, and genetic findings.[6] Early diagnosis is crucial, as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation may slow disease progression if initiated pre-symptomatically.[7]

CONCLUSION

This case illustrates the classic imaging and electrophysiological features of infantile-onset Krabbe disease. Integration of MRI, nerve conduction studies, OAE screening, and genomic analysis was key in reaching a timely diagnosis. Awareness of early peripheral and auditory involvement may broaden the clinical suspicion of Krabbe disease in infants with hypotonia and developmental delay.

TEACHING POINTS

  1. We should raise a concern about leukodystrophy in pediatric MRI showing bilateral symmetrical periventricular altered signal intensities in the correct clinical setting.

  2. Involvement of the thalamus in the form of T2 hypointensity is not necessarily seen in all cases of Krabbe’s disease.

  3. There is an importance of genetic testing in confirming or supporting the radiological interpretation in cases of leukodystrophies.

MCQs

  1. Which MRI finding is most characteristic of Krabbe’s disease?

    1. Subcortical U-fiber involvement

    2. Symmetrical T2 hyperintensities in periventricular white matter

    3. Diffuse cortical atrophy without white matter changes

    4. Basal ganglia calcifications

    Answer key: b

  2. Which of the following is not a finding of infantile-onset Krabbe’s disease?

    1. Symmetrical deep cerebral white matter involvement

    2. Isolated involvement of the corticospinal tract

    3. Dentate hilum hyperintensity

    4. Thalamic hypointensity

    Answer key: b

  3. Which of the following areas is not involved in any phenotype of Krabbe’s disease?

    1. Cerebellar white matter

    2. Optic nerve

    3. Posterior limb of internal capsule

    4. Cerebral cortex

    Answer key: d

Ethical approval:

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

Patient’s consent not required as patients identity is not disclosed or compromised.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. . Globoid cell leukodystrophy (Krabbe's disease): Update. J Child Neurol. 2003;18:595-603.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. Transplantation of umbilical-cord blood in babies with infantile Krabbe's disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2069-81.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Imaging of pediatric leukodystrophies: A pattern-based approach. Radiographics. 2021;41:1383-405.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Revisiting magnetic resonance imaging pattern of Krabbe disease-lessons from an Indian cohort. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2019;9:25.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , . Classification of leukodystrophies In: Magnetic resonance of myelination and myelin disorders. Berlin: Springer; . p. :213-31.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. , . Leukodystrophies and genetic leukoencephalopathies in children. PediatrClin North Am. 2008;55:281-300.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , . A staging system for infantile Krabbe disease to predict outcome after unrelated umbilical cord blood transplantation. Pediatrics. 2006;118:e879-89.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections